This research has examined the validity and significance of narrations related to the judgment of Imam Mahdi in Shiite hadith sources by analyzing their documentary and content. By focusing on early sources such as "Al-Muhasin" (Barqi, 3rd century AH) and "Basair al-Darajat" (Saffar, 3rd century AH), it was found that although some narrations are subject to criticism due to weak narrators (such as Muhammad ibn Ali), the repetition of common themes in narrations with more authentic narrations (such as the narration of Aban ibn Taghlib) and the citation of scholars such as Sheikh Saduq confirm their content validity. The findings show that Imam Mahdi's (a.s.) judgment, without seeking evidence, is based on divine knowledge and in line with the prophetic tradition such as David. This method not only does not conflict with the previous judicial tradition, but also is consistent with the position of the divine knowledge of the Imamate in Shiite thought. The study of the spiritual continuity and transmission of these narrations in later societies such as "Bihar al-Anwar" strengthens its acceptance in the Shiite intellectual system.